|
Learning Democracy
Democracy is less a means of governing than it is a mode of living
in the world. The capacity for self-determined individuals to produce
and act upon a will in common is essential to fulfilling both the
true individual and the authentic community. The evident lack of
this capacity in our world suggests that much more is required than
structures that nominally provide opportunity for citizen input.
Fulfilling the promise of creative democracy requires attitudes
and skills that must be cultivated and exercised in the course of
normal human learning and development.
This kind of learning will take generations to foster, and must
take place at the most elementary levels of the home, the school,
and the neighborhood. The Learning Democracy program will provide
support to initiatives that contribute to the cultivation of democratic
attitudes and personal skills at these elementary levels. The program
will also support the development of new institutions that can afford
greater opportunities for democratic interaction and learning.
- back
to top -
Participatory Design of Social Systems
In many senses we live through our public institutions, corporate
endeavors, and other human activity systems. We are dependent upon
our systems of education, health, justice, governance, and economy.
Unfortunately, these institutions and organizations have become
separated from the individuals that they serve. They can become
opaque, rigid, and distant. They seem to take on a life of themselves
that is divorced from our aspirations and the needs of the environment
in which they are embedded. The values and beliefs that underlie
the system become fuzzy or opaque. There is no conversation about
the very nature and purpose of the institution. Stakeholders - those
affected by the system - are not involved in their design. In times
of change, the institutions become unresponsive, and the result
is chronic crisis in community that is often mistaken as a problem
inside the system requiring simple adjustment.
The Foundation is committed to building literacy and competence
in the participatory design of social systems. Design is defined
in this context as a disciplined, creative, decision-oriented process
by which the stakeholders in a system - everyone who serves, is
served by, and is affected by that system - create the system that
fits their aspirations and the needs of the environment in which
it is embedded. This kind of design is continuous and involves democratic
openness, dialogue, and idealization. It is proactive, creative,
and ultimately human. The participatory design of social systems
is a new kind of experience for our society, but it is one that
may be essential for life in coming decades.
- back to top -
Dialogue as Community Reflection
Our experience of reality is constantly mediated by assumptions,
many of them hidden. They are carried in the language in which we
think, and in the images that form the glasses of perception that
we wear. Yet it is rare that we think about our thinking. The results
can be disastrous. One problem is that our view of the world remains
fixed in a fragmented state. When we are then confronted with differences
in values, beliefs, or ideas, we do not appreciate it as an opportunity.
Instead, we too often seek to deny or to destroy the difference.
It is in this way that conflict takes on negative and pathological
forms such as war, which can be seen in microcosm in our own homes
and cities.
Another problem with the lack of reflection upon the assumptions
that shape our perceptions - particularly the lack of this experience
in a social context - is that it maintains the sense that what goes
on "out there" in the world is separate from what we think and do
in our daily lives. In order to break down this barrier, to empower
people individually and collectively, to advance the recognition
of difference as opportunity for learning and creation, and to keep
culture "fresh," the Foundation advocates and supports the experience
of dialogue at the ultra-local level: neighborhoods, schools, and
workplaces. If dialogue as community reflection can become a regular
and organic part of everyday life, it will go a long way toward
reducing the fragmentation in our lives and in our world.
- back
to top -
Evolutionary Inquiry
During the 20th century, developments in the biological, physical,
and social sciences allowed for the emergence of a new kind of knowledge:
the understanding of patterns of irreversible, unpredictable, transformative
change that are common to all complex systems, whether physical,
chemical, biological, psychological, socio-cultural, ecological,
or cosmic. The inquiry into these patterns, sometimes called General
Evolution Theory or Evolutionary Systems Theory, is best exemplified
by the work of scientists and thinkers like Kenneth Boulding, Ilya
Prigogine, Ervin Laszlo, Jonas Salk, and Bela H. Banathy. Evolutionary
Inquiry has opened new opportunities for an integrated understanding
of the world. It has also led to new questions, and potential answers,
about the dynamics of our era and the meaning of our lives. It may
also, therefore, be related to the choices that we make today.
This area of interest has two integrated aspects: General Evolution
Theory and Evolutionary Advocacy and Activism. General Evolution
Theory contributes to the fostering of evolutionary consciousness
- an understanding of our position and role in a journey that goes
beyond our own lifetimes. Evolutionary Advocacy and Activism refers
to the skills, tools, movements, and new types of human organization
that can enable the conscious co-evolution of cultures toward greater
harmony with the evolution of the individuals who make them up and
with the environments in which they are embedded. It is closely
related to democratic experience. The Foundation recognizes Evolutionary
Inquiry as a core competency for the 21st century, and will support
its advancement.
- back
to top -
|